| lomus? [proe ) talo Ì 98 tenus eft obiectivè in intellectu ſeu voluntate. Sic Apoftolis ait, fe ha- bere Philippenſes in corde, Phil, 1. 7. utique non realiter, ſed obieétivè,quas jevih tenus Paulus de illis frequenter cogi- nculun tabat, eofquė unicèamabat, Sic my-(gasco fterianoftræ fidei dicuntur effe præ- Innh fentia credenti, nimirum obieétivès Interr non realiter, Hebr. 11..Idem dicen-` iumin dumeft dealijs potentijs fervatå pro- trgu portione, Præter has duasadhuc tertia koki præſentia eft intentionalis, qus€- nlio! contrà intelle&tus vel voluntás dici- tur eſſe in obiecto cognito vel amato: velſs quatenus videlicetpotentia tendit pet ſum t ſuum actum in obiectum. Sic Chri- pitur ſtus dicit, cor noſtrum eſſe ibi, nbi eft tusho noſter theſaurus, Math. 6. 21. SiC zy Apoſtolus aſſerit, noſtram cõverſatio- hyi, nem effeincælis, Phil. 3. 20.quodnon ing, alio modoyerum eft, quàm quia cæ-[mnus leftia cogitamus& fapimus.- Sic S. hosel Bernardus lib. de præcept.&diſcip, ait, Kiciqu animum intimiùs habitare& præfen- hreg] tem cffe,ubiamat, quàmubi animat, Iam his poſitis Contra Stuckium eſt 1. quia Chry- Chr ſoſto⸗
zum Hauptmenü