![]()
SIA ve Preſens eſſe corpus Chriſti in evchariſid circumſcriptidè pertendum: alij verò, veluti Bonaventurà in ꝗ. ſent. diſt.44. 10. q. 4. Thomas quodl. 9. q. 32. Du. randus in g fent. dift, 44: q. 6. Capreo- lus ibid. q. 1. art. 3, docent, corpm Chrise fii praſens eſſe non circumſeriptivè, ſed penetrativè© indivifibiliter, non per modum quantitatis dimenfiva; fed fub ſtantia. Oui quidem partium illarum diſſenſus prabet nobis Sllogiſinum con. era prefintiam corporalem Chrifi evi» dlentiſſimum, cujus utraque premifa nis titur argumentis al iphis partibus liti. gantikbus fuppeditatis. Talis autem eſt: In quibuſcunque locis ſimul poteſt corpus Chrifti per miraculum effe corporaliter feu fubftantialiter, in ijf- dem. locis fimul poteft effe per. mirae raculum cireumſeriptivè. At corpus Chriſti non poteſt per miraculum ſimul eſſe in pluribus locis eircumſcriptivẽ. Ergo corpus Chrifti non poteft pet miraculum fimul effe in pluribuslocis corporaliter ſeu ſubſtantialiter. Propolitionem majorem clariſim pre mban feela, 'nnias ralis mef j muen ihasj we d ufan wiin wdy wuer nand niin Ki u conf Wand nitita heup tfia kerei llllit⸗ unita liry lbi, lein Eai Mami 