Rulant. d. c. 10. n. 6.Du NVuSsASO TIZSsTIVN.controuerſia, quid conſiderandum? Rulant. d.y,£- 10. m 17, Deqʒ ſtatutis locorum particularibusattendendis, Farinac. d. loco-n. 117.um effrenato numero reprimendo,& quis nume-rus teſtium effrenatus dicatur. Menoch. de arbitr.indic. queſt. lib. 2: caſu. 249. Teſtium multitudoquos iuris pariat effectus, vide Maſcard. d. conclaſs1081. fub fine. Et an numerus teſtium in com⸗miſsione expreſſus augeri poſsit à commiſſario.Capvr.De officio tdtis in de-ponendo.Estis qualiter deponere debeat;vide Montic. tract. tom. 4. fol. 259.col, 2. Campeg. reg. 109. 287. iper relationem poſsit? Monticel.d.FE259. Alberic. c. 7. u. 69.Depoſitio in ſcriptis facta, eſt re- Peponijciẽda text eſt. c. relatum. 5. qu, 2 Rulant. lb. 2. dètellib, exam, c. 15, Felin. inc. de fefab n. 7. vbi limi:itat quinġ; modis;& multisın locis coufuetudineita receptum elt, praæfertim in regno Bohemiæ&y vicinis prouincjs, irem in Aufiria& B zuara, ybihoc nobilhus permiſſum eſt, yt ſine corporah iu-ramento per ſcripturam obſignatam deponant.Gail 4b, 1. /100 b. 21. 22. C obſer. 10l. n. 14.Teſtis repetitus quomodo deponere debeat, vi-de Campeg. res. 279. 368. Nellũ p. 2. 1. 198. Alb;c. 7. n. 68. Gail. lib. 1. 0bf.10 4s Mynf, cent. 3of6 4An decrimine vel inhabtilitate interrogatus reipo+dere teneatur? Monticeh, fol. 261. c0). 1.Teſti adhoc vt probet tenetur, xeddlere ratio- rariongmnã dicti ſui: Quia icire, eſt rem per cauſas cognoſ-. cti reddere t6M.iyiN
