464ſtus ſecundùm corpus præſens eſt lo.caliter Evchariſtiæ, neceſſarid eritactu ſimul ſubſtantialiter in pluribuslocisʒadeoque moauroravjcùm certumſit, Ev hariſtiam ſimul actu in pluri-bus locis eſſe. Syllogifinuseft in for-mâ. Ergo evidens videtur Concluſio,Reſp. I. per Inſt.& ſequentem ſyl⸗logiſmumoppono.Eadem fubftantia non poteſt effe Tori-reο, ideſt, in 7 luribus locis fimul attafubſtantialiter eæ: flens.Sed fi anima fecundum fuam fubflanrinm prefèns efi localiter corpori toraingualsher corporis parte, eadem fubftanezia eſſet acl ſimul ſubſtantialiten in Plusribus locisexiſtens, adedque moννονν.Ergo anima fecundum fuam ſubſtan⸗tiam non poteſt eſſe localiter præſens cor.Pori tota in qualibet corporis parte.Major probatur iſſdem ferè argu-mentis, quibus D, Heiddegg. fuamprobare conatur į nempe, quia ean-dem fubftantiam efe fimul atu fubftanetialiter pluribus in locis, etiam longè ab-ſurdiſſimum eſt. ſi longè abſurdißi-mum eſt. idem corpus in pluribus gellekholunonplicattaluielatgmetiiti
